Below is the opening address given by Nicola Sturgeon to SNP Conference 2016.

Conference.

Welcome to the Dear Green Place.

Welcome to the great city of Glasgow.

A city that said Yes in 2014.

A city where every citizen is now represented in the Scottish Parliament by an SNP constituency MSP.

Let me begin today by warmly congratulating our new Depute Leader, Angus Robertson.

We had four first class candidates to choose from.

Indeed, we had more quality in our race for depute than Labour managed in its election for leader.

Friends,

Let me, on your behalf, thank Tommy, Alyn and Chris for bringing their talents, energy and ideas to the contest.

Each of you has a massive contribution to make to the future of our party.

And Angus – you will be an outstanding deputy leader. I am delighted to have you by my side and I look forward to working with you as we lead our party and our country to even greater success.

Conference,

Over the next three days, we will talk in detail about our work to build a better, fairer Scotland.

On Saturday, my conference address will focus on our plans to help business and create jobs.

On our work to expand childcare and close the attainment gap in our schools.

On our absolute, undiminished commitment to invest in and reform our precious NHS.

At the heart of every single one of our plans is the ambition to build an inclusive Scotland.

A country where everyone has the opportunity to contribute to – and the right to benefit from – the better Scotland we are building together.

A country where we cherish diversity and value people for the contribution they make – not one where we judge them on the country of their birth or the colour of their passport.

The contrast with the Westminster government couldn’t be more stark.

Last week, in Birmingham, we heard an intolerance towards those from other countries that has no place in a modern, multicultural, civilised society.

You know, on the day of the Prime Minister’s speech to the Tory conference, the new leader of UKIP resigned.

Perhaps she realized that her job and her party are now redundant.

Last week, we saw the Tories adopt UKIP policy and Farage-style rhetoric – lock, stock and beer-barrel.

It was a disgrace. It shames the Tory party and all who speak for it.

But make no mistake – the right wing of the Tory party is now in the ascendancy and it is seeking to hijack the referendum result.

Brexit has become Tory Brexit.

The rampant right wing of the party are using it as license for the xenophobia that has long lain under the surface – but which is now in full, unlovely view.

They are using the result as cover for a hard Brexit for which they have no mandate – but which they are determined to impose, regardless of the ruinous consequences.

Worse still, they intend to do all of this with no parliamentary authority. Virtually no scrutiny whatsoever.

And to do it with complete disregard for Scotland’s democratic voice.

That is simply not acceptable.

Last week, the Prime Minister told us that how important it was to respect the democratic mandate of the people.

I agree.

Which is why I say this to her today – it’s high time you showed some respect for the 62% of people across Scotland who voted to Remain.

Of course, I know that one million of our fellow citizens voted to Leave. They did so for a range of legitimate reasons and as First Minister, I have a duty to listen to, to understand and to respond to these reasons.

But I suspect that many of those who voted to Leave, look now at the actions and rhetoric of the Tories and think ‘that’s not what I voted for’.

They may have voted to take back control.

But I can’t imagine many of them voted to hand control to the unholy trinity of Boris Johnson, David Davis and Liam Fox.

Boris Johnson, David Davis and Liam Fox – three men in a Brexit boat who haven’t got a paddle between them.

No, I don’t believe people voted for that.

They didn’t vote to throw economic rationality out of the window.

They didn’t vote to lower their own living standards or to sacrifice jobs and investment.

They didn’t vote for our businesses to face tariffs or for holiday-makers to need visas.

They didn’t vote for the scapegoating of foreigners.

And they didn’t vote for the voice of Scotland’s people and our parliament to be ignored.

Yet all of these are clear and present dangers: all of that will happen unless we fight against it.

And we will.

Friends,

Our single most important job is to protect Scotland’s interests.

Our democratic interests.

Our economic interests.

Our interests in social protection and solidarity.

And our interest in influencing the world we live in.

There is no doubt that Brexit is a defining issue of our time – for Scotland and for the U.K.

It looms over everything. How could it not, given the implications for our economy, our society, our security and our place in the world?

So today I want to concentrate on what we will do in the months ahead to protect the interests of Scotland and – in so far as we can – of the UK as a whole.

Firstly, we will make our case in the House of Commons and in the Scottish Parliament.

I can confirm today that SNP MPs will vote against the Brexit Bill when it come before the House of Commons next year.

That Bill will repeal the legislation that enacted our EU membership. Scotland didn’t vote for that and so neither will our MPs.

But we will also work to persuade others – Labour, Liberals and moderate Tories – to join us in a coalition against a hard Brexit: not just for Scotland, but for the whole UK.

We know that Brexit will damage our economy.

Hard Brexit – removal, not just from the EU, but from the single market as well – will be disastrous.

The Treasury estimates that the cost to the UK economy could be £66 billion.

Here in Scotland 80,000 jobs could be lost. Wages would be hit by up to £2000 and growth in the economy would slow.

There is no rational case for taking the UK out of the single market.

And there is no authority for it either.

How many times did we hear prominent Leave campaigners assure us during the referendum campaign that leaving the EU did not mean leaving the single market?

And the Conservative Party manifesto, on which Theresa May and every other Tory MP was elected, couldn’t have been clearer. It said this: “We say yes to the Single Market.”

But now we face a hard Brexit imposed by the hard right of the Tory party.

Well, let me say this. The Prime Minister may have a mandate to take England and Wales out of the EU but she has no mandate whatsoever to remove any part of the UK from the Single Market.

And if the majority in the House of Commons stand up for what they know to be right, she will not get away with doing it.

Friends,

We will also assert the right of the Scottish Parliament to have its say.

After the No vote in 2014 we were told the Sewel Convention – which means the UK Parliament can’t make law in devolved areas without the consent of the Scottish Parliament – would be sacrosanct.

Every party signed up to this.

Now it seems the Tories are reneging.

They want to rip-up the Smith report.

Well, they need to understand this – Scotland’s Parliament is the democratic heartbeat of our nation.

To deny it the right to give or withhold its consent on an issue of such magnitude would be an act of constitutional vandalism. It is not on.

Conference,

As well as Parliamentary action, over the next few weeks we will table specific proposals to protect Scotland’s interests in Europe and keep us in the single market – even if the rest of the UK decides to leave.

It’s clear that beyond hard-line rhetoric the UK Government has no detailed plan.

So the Scottish Government will set out a plan for Scotland.|

We will seek to make this plan a key element of the UK’s Article 50 negotiation.

It will require substantial additional powers for the Scottish Parliament.

All the powers in our areas of responsibility that currently lie with the EU – and significant new powers too.

Powers to strike international deals.

And greater powers over immigration. Powers not just to protect our economy, but also our values.

UK ministers might believe it acceptable to order businesses to create lists of foreign workers.

We do not.

Our ambition is to build a prosperous, inclusive and outward looking country.

Conference,

The morning after the referendum, I said I would seek to find a way to allow Scotland’s voice to be heard and our interests to be protected.

And I said I would explore if that could happen within the UK.

The plan we table will honour that commitment.

But let me be clear – its chance of success will depend, not on us, but on the attitude of the UK government.

Recent signs have not been promising.

Last week, we heard from the Prime Minister a disregard for Scotland’s democratic voice that was reminiscent of Margaret Thatcher.

An assertion of Westminster constitutional supremacy that belongs in another century.

High-handed pronouncements that dismiss Scottish opinion might delight the Tory Party conference – but they are no longer acceptable to mainstream Scotland.

So my message to the Prime Minister is this.

Scotland didn’t choose to be in this situation – your party put us here.

In 2014, you told us Scotland was an equal partner in the UK.

Well, the moment has come to prove it.

If you value the UK – as you say you do – it’s up to you to prove it can work for Scotland.

The ball is in your court.

But hear this – if you think for one single second that I’m not serious about doing what it takes to protect Scotland’s interests, then think again.

If you can’t – or won’t – allow us to protect our interests within the UK, then Scotland will have the right to decide, afresh, if it wants to take a different path.

A hard Brexit will change the UK fundamentally.

A UK out of the single market – isolated, inward looking, haemorrhaging jobs, investment and opportunities – will not be the same country that Scotland voted to stay part of in 2014.

If that’s the insecure, unstable prospect we face as part of the UK, then no one will have the right to deny Scotland the chance to choose a better future.

Friends,

On the morning after the referendum, I said I would protect Scotland’s ability to make that choice.

In our Programme for Government, I committed to publishing a draft referendum bill.

I am determined that Scotland will have the ability to reconsider the question of independence – and to do so before the UK leaves the EU – if that is necessary to protect our country’s interests.

So I can confirm today that the Independence Referendum Bill will be published for consultation next week.

You know, there’s not a day that passes just now without someone advising me to hurry up with a referendum.

And there’s not a day that passes without someone advising me to slow down.

Welcome to my world.

But the responsibility of leadership is to act in the best interests of our country as a whole.

The morning after the EU referendum, I said that I’d be guided at all times by a simple, clear test.

What is best for the people of Scotland?

That’s the principle that I will continue to be guided by – and I know I can on your support every step of the way.

Friends,

There is one final point I want to make. And it’s an important one.

When Scotland does come to take this decision again – whenever that might be – we must not take for granted how anyone will vote.

It will be a new debate – not a rerun of 2014.

We must not assume that people’s views – yes or no – are the same today as they were two years ago.

Instead we must engage the arguments with a fresh eye and an open mind.

The case for independence will have to be made and won.

But let’s never lose sight of this –

We are one of the wealthiest nations on earth.

We are rich in natural resources.

We are world-leaders in life sciences, technology and renewables.

We are at the cutting edge of advanced manufacturing.

In tourism, and in food and drink we are unrivaled.

Our foundations are strong.

So if the choice we face is an inward looking, insular, Brexit Britain, governed by a right wing Tory party, obsessed with borders and blue passports at the expense of economic strength and stability –

Or a progressive, outward looking, internationalist Scotland, able to chart our own course and build our own security and prosperity, then know this –

– that is a case we will win.

Friends,

We stand for a fairer, wealthier, outward looking, progressive Scotland.

Let’s make it happen.

Scot Gov Report

Matheson: work goes on to keep driving down violent crime.

The number of homicides in Scotland fell to their lowest on record last year – and around half their level from a decade ago, according to official figures published today.

A total of 57 homicide cases were recorded by police in Scotland in 2015-16 – representing an 8% fall on the previous year and 52% down on the 119 cases recorded in 2006-07.

The figure of 57 – contained in a new bulletin published by Scotland’s Chief Statistician today – is the lowest number for a single twelve-month period since 1976, the first year for which comparable data are available.

Responding to the figures, Cabinet Secretary for Justice Mr Matheson said:

“While it is encouraging to see continued falls in homicide cases alongside the long-term decline in violent crime, the sustained efforts that have helped achieve this – through education and enforcement – must continue, because each of the lives lost is one life too many.

“There is a clear role across a range of public services, in addition to the critical work of our police, to continue to support communities that may remain at risk from violent crime and to challenge irresponsible attitudes both to alcohol misuse and to so-called ‘casual’ violence.

“We will continue to work with partners and invest in a range of projects to help steer our young people away from the risks of a life of violence and crime, while also ensuring our law enforcement agencies and the courts have the powers and resources needed to deal with those who do harm to others.”

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/Homicides-fall-to-record-low-2cec.aspx

FM announces help for developing countries to measure and tackle climate change.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has reaffirmed Scotland’s commitment to global leadership with £1 million to support developing countries tackle the challenge of climate change.

The Scottish Government funding will help developing countries better measure climate change and track its impacts, improving global assessment of progress following the Paris Agreement.

The move was announced by the First Minister at the Arctic Circle Assembly in Reykjavik, a gathering of around 2,000 delegates from 50 countries with an interest in the development of the Arctic and its consequences for the future of the planet.

Ms Sturgeon said:

“Scotland may not geographically be part of the Arctic Circle, but like every delegate here today we are committed to acting on climate change and limiting global temperature increases to below 1.5 degrees.

“We know the most damaging effects of climate change are in developing nations and fall disproportionately on the very young, the very old and the very poor.

“That’s why Scotland was the first national government in the world to establish a Climate Justice Fund, which now supports 11 projects in some of the world’s poorest communities in four sub-Saharan African countries.

“Following the Paris Agreement on climate change, countries can’t just stand back and wait – we all have to deliver. The funding I am announcing today will help developing countries better measure and track climate change, leading to a greater global understanding of how effective we are in limiting its effects.

“This is also a clear signal that we’ll do everything we can to remain an open, outward looking country that works to strengthen our partnerships around the world.”

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/International-action-on-climate-change-2c90.aspx

UCG will have no place in Scotland’s energy mix.

The Scottish Government will not support underground coal gasification (UCG) developments in Scotland following the publication of an independent report that highlights serious environmental concerns.

UCG should not be confused with hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, or coal-bed methane both of which are Unconventional Oil and Gas (UOG) technologies. Today’s announcement has no bearing on the policy on either of these technologies, which remain covered by the Scottish Government’s moratorium on UOG technologies.

The Scottish Government put in place a moratorium on UCG in October last year so that evidence on the practice could be gathered and considered.

Professor Campbell Gemmell of University of Glasgow was tasked to undertake an independent examination of UCG. Having received his report, Minister for Business, Innovation and Energy Paul Wheelhouse today [Thursday, October 6] updated Parliament on the Scottish Government’s response to the findings.

The report finds that it would appear logical “to progress toward a ban” of UCG, based on a variety of reasons, including:

• the UCG industry having a history of incidents of pollution and losses of containment and;
• UCG presenting a serious issue to face in reducing Scotland’s carbon/greenhouse gas emissions without an operational storage method, such as carbon capture.

Mr Wheelhouse said:

“Having considered the report in detail, it is the Scottish Government’s view that UCG poses numerous and serious environmental risks and, on that basis, the Scottish Government cannot support this technology. Accordingly, UCG will have no place in Scotland’s energy mix at this time.

“In Professor Gemmell’s report he recommends it would be wise to consider an approach to UCG based upon a precautionary presumption against the technology, and that it would appear logical to progress toward a ban.

“I cannot predict what kind of clean energy technologies may be available in the decades to come, but what is certain is that this this resource will still be there. As a result of today’s announcement, our Energy Strategy for Scotland will set out an energy mix for the future that does not include UCG. The position I have announced on UCG is a clear validation of the evidence-based approach this government is taking and I thank Professor Gemmell for his work in preparing the report.”

Mr Wheelhouse has written to the UK Government, requesting that it issues no further UCG licences in Scotland and that existing licences are revoked. The Scottish Government will continue to use planning powers available to it to ensure UCG applications do not receive planning or environmental permission.

Professor Campbell Gemmell, Professor of Environment Research, Policy, Regulation and Governance at the University of Glasgow, said:

“I have consulted widely, including with industry, communities, regulators, academic specialists and NGOs, and studied the available evidence on the technologies and impacts involved in Underground Coal Gasification, including the variety of international experience. It is extremely difficult to conceive of UCG progressing into use at this time. Despite there being few longer-term operations at scale to consider, and no directly comparable operations in siting, regulatory and policy terms, there is both a history of incidents of pollution and losses of containment.

“In my view, the Scottish Government has responded appropriately to the available evidence on this technology.

“Should industry wish to progress this technology at scale here or overseas at some future date, several key factors would need to be addressed, including managing the potential impact of the greenhouse gases produced. The onus would also clearly be with the industry to demonstrate and provide evidence that it can operate to the high environmental standards that the government and public should expect.”

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/Underground-coal-gasification-blocked-2c9f.aspx

£29M programme for innovative poverty measures part of Fairer Scotland Action Plan

Fifty bold and ambitious actions to achieve a fairer Scotland for everyone have been outlined in a landmark plan published today by Communities Secretary Angela Constance.

A £29 million programme, including £12.5m from the European Social Fund, is being established for communities and the third sector to design, test and deliver new approaches to tackling poverty and improving lives.

The Fairer Scotland Action Plan (FSAP) lists 50 actions to be achieved in the next 14 years under five themes of a fairer Scotland for all, an end to child poverty, a strong start for all young people, fairer working lives and a thriving third age:

•setting a target for councils to make at least 1% of their budgets available for community-designed projects
•making funds available to support disabled people running for elected office
•helping refugee families settling in Scotland under Family Reunion rules access grants as quickly as possible
•delivering 100% superfast broadband and helping low-income households reduce costs
•convening an affordable energy summit
•the first national plan for BSL
•help to promote family-friendly working
•introducing a Bill to establish domestic abuse as a specific offence.

And for the first time anywhere in the UK, the FSAP commits the Scottish Government, councils and other public bodies to a Socio-Economic Duty – assessing the impact certain policy or service changes will have on tackling poverty – which will soon go to consultation.

Already backed by specific pledges from some of Scotland’s best-known employers and third sector bodies, the plan was launched at the Prince’s Trust’s Glasgow headquarters, where Communities Secretary Angela Constance joined in a workshop with local teenagers.

Ms Constance said:

“Our ambition is for a fair, smart, inclusive Scotland with genuine equality of opportunity for everyone.

“Our Fairer Scotland Action Plan backs up that ambition with concrete action.

“It contains 50 specific steps to create a more equal society – including eradicating child poverty – and a new £29 million programme to tackle poverty.

“We are also the first in the UK to commit to making all public bodies consider how our big decisions tackle poverty, by implementing a socio-economic duty.

“In addition, some of our best-known employers are joining us in these efforts by signing pledges to do more. They see it’s not only the right thing to do but also good business.

“This is a watershed moment in Scotland and a significant milestone in our quest for equality.

“Through these bold and ambitious steps, Scotland will be a fairer, more equal country for everyone by 2030.”

Economy Secretary Keith Brown said:

“The Fairer Scotland Action Plan’s new £29 million programme, which has secured £12.5m from the European Social Fund, will enable communities and the third sector to develop and deliver innovative solutions to poverty and disadvantage.

“We all know that in June, Scotland voted to remain in the EU and the Scottish Government firmly believes that membership delivers many social, economic and cultural benefits for individuals, business and communities.

“This investment from the European Structural Funds is yet another illustration of these advantages and is why maintaining our EU membership and preserving this kind of funding for the long term is a top priority.”

Allan Watt, Prince’s Trust Scotland, Director, said:

“Too many young people lose hope and leave school or college with few qualifications, low levels of confidence and low aspirations for the future. An important focus of our Fairer Scotland pledge is to help close the education attainment gap for disadvantaged young people.

“The Prince’s Trust’s new education programme, Achieve, will support those young people by giving them more chances and opportunities to change their lives.”

Jayne-Anne Gadhia, Chief Executive of Virgin Money, which has pledged in the plan, said:

“The publication of the Scottish Government’s “Fairer Scotland Action Plan” is a timely challenge to us all to do our bit to make Scotland a fairer place in which to live and work.

“I firmly believe that businesses as well as individuals have a key role to play in this movement. I fully support the Scottish Government for taking this positive step forward.”

Jim Sweeney MBE, YouthLink Chief Executive, said:

“YouthLink Scotland, the National Agency for Youth Work in Scotland, are delighted to support disseminate and contribute to the Action Plan for A Fairer Scotland.

“With our hundred plus member organisations and networks we will promote equality and diversity, rights and participation for the 400,000 young people involved with youth work on a regular basis.”

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/Fifty-actions-to-achieve-a-fairer-Scotland-2c80.aspx

Scot Gov Health Secretary condemns UK Government’s “short-sighted” approach

Scotland’s Health Secretary, Shona Robison, has today said that doctors from abroad will be welcome to train and work in the NHS north of the border.

Ms Robison condemned comments from the UK Government this morning that overseas doctors will only be able to stay in the NHS until they are replaced by UK doctors.

Ms Robison said: “These are irresponsible comments that will hamper NHS efforts to recruit doctors to vacancies and training places now – and that in turn could have a real impact on patient care.

“As such, the UK Government’s position is short-sighted in the extreme.

“Medical professionals from outside this country have played a vital and valued part in our NHS for decades, and continue to do so, and their contribution should not be dismissed in this way.

“In Scotland we want the best and the brightest from around the world to stay, build their careers here and contribute to the economy and our society.

“Of course it is also very important to invest in our workforce at home too. That is why we have already announced an additional 50 medical student places in Scottish Universities from August 2016, and a new Graduate Entry Medical programme with up to 40 places available.

“Our young doctors want good quality, attractive training places which offer rewarding experiences and flexible working.

“But it has also long been a common practice that young doctors go abroad to experience the different opportunities and challenges of health services across the world – we shouldn’t deprive them of these experiences, because the UK Government’s actions also risk shutting down such opportunities for our own young medics.”

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://news.scotland.gov.uk/News/Overseas-doctors-welcome-in-Scotland-2c75.aspx

May’s 100 unanswered questions, 100 days on from the Brexit result (By Angus Robertson MP)

We are now 100 days on from the EU referendum result, and the utter lack of clarity from the Prime Minister and the rest of the UK Government is a shameful abdication of responsibility.

The Tories are in the process of walking the UK economy off a cliff with a vague promise that they’ll find a parachute on the way down. It’s not good enough.

People in Scotland voted overwhelmingly against leaving the EU – but even Leave voters must be worried by Theresa May’s inability to outline even the basics of what ‘Brexit means Brexit’ actually means.

Today the SNP is publishing 100 Brexit questions 100 days on – it is by no means an exhaustive list, but is shows the sheer scale of uncertainty facing Scotland and the rest of the UK. The Prime Minister is today set to address the Tory conference on Brexit – she needs to take the opportunity to start delivering at least some of the answers.

Theresa May’s Brexit ministers are more interested in post-Empire fantasies about commissioning new Royal yachts than doing the hard work required – and this casual approach is putting jobs, investment and economic prosperity at risk.

Angus Robertson MP, SNP Westminster Leader

Trade

1. Will the UK still be a member of the single market?

2. If not, what will the terms of the UK’s access to the single market be?

3. Will the UK remain a member of the European Union Customs Union?

4. Was the establishment of the Department for International Trade an admission that the UK has no intention of remaining a member of the European Union Customs Union?

5. Will the UK have to make a financial contribution to the EU?

6. In the Holyrood debate of 30th June 2016 Ruth Davidson said: “Retaining our place in the single market should be the overriding priority.” How will the Tories ensure that Scotland remains in the single market?

7. What preparatory work has the UK Government done on the tariff agreements that would be required with the EU and other countries in the event of being outside the single market?

8. Will businesses be able to continue to trade with the EU without customs checks or other administrative costs?

9. Has the UK Government discussed proposed new trade arrangements with the WTO?

10. What guarantees has the UK Government sought or received from other nations that punitive tariff levels will not be imposed on UK produce – such as steel exports – in the event of not being in the single market?

11. Has the UK Government produced any estimates of the likely impact of Brexit on inward investment levels?

12. Has the UK Government spoken to the Japanese Government about the report it published on Brexit, and what guarantees have been sought regarding Japanese investment in the UK?

13. Has the UK Government engaged with the US Government regarding President Obama’s remarks – made both prior to and after the EU referendum – that the UK will now find itself “at the back of the queue” when it comes to US trade priorities in Europe?

14. Has the UK Government opened discussions with the United States on a post-Brexit trade agreement?

15. What does the UK Government conclude from President Obama’s remarks about the future of the so-called “special relationship” with the United States?

16. Are the talks held by the UK Government since June 23rd with non-EU nations regarding bilateral trade deals in breach of the UK’s still current EU treaty obligations? And if so, is the UK risking financial penalties and fines from the EU?

17. On 5 June 2016 the then Prime Minister David Cameron said: “Those campaigning to leave Europe are inviting the British people to make an extraordinary choice – to be the first major economy in history to deliberately choose a second-rate, more restrictive trading relationship for its biggest market…” Why do so many Conservatives who supported ‘Remain’ now enthusiastically ‘choose a second-rate, more restrictive trading relationship for [the UK’s] biggest market’?

18. On 18 April 2016 the then Chancellor George Osborne cited treasury analysis saying every household would be £4,300 a year worse off and that the effects of Brexit meant “Britain would be permanently poorer. Britain’s families would be permanently poorer too…” How much poorer do the Conservative party believe people in Scotland will be if we were to be pulled out of the EU?

19. On 26 May 2016 Tory MSP John Lamont said that the European negotiating position has allowed international trade agreements that have opened up new markets for Scottish produce but that “We do not know what the alternative would be if the UK voted to leave”. Can he or the Conservatives now tell us what the alternative is since they now appear to be backing Brexit?

20. On 21 June 2016 Ruth Davidson said: “Basic questions over restrictions, tariffs or the ability of British workers to operate abroad are dismissed instead of answered…’Out’ doesn’t just fail the certainty test.” Now that she appears to support Brexit what “certainty test” has she met to ensure there will be no such restrictions or tariffs if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

21. On 22 June 2016 Theresa May as Home Secretary warned people in Northern Ireland that there could be “tariffs on exporting goods into the EU” if we’re out of the European Union. What level of tariffs do the Conservatives think will be levelled on Scottish goods if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

22. Before the EU referendum vote the Scottish Secretary David Mundell wrote: “Hundreds of thousands of jobs in Scotland depend on having access to the EU’s single market. What would happen to the families who rely on those jobs for their livelihoods if we were to pull out of the EU?” What would happen to those families who rely on those jobs if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

23. On 31 May 2015 the then Prime Minister David Cameron warned Eurosceptic Tories that quitting the EU would leave farmers facing punishing tariffs on their exports. He said: “It’s for [Eurosceptics] to look those farmers in the eye and tell them if they’re going to have to pay tariffs and, if so, how much.” How much will Scottish farmers have to pay in tariffs if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

24. Before the EU referendum vote David Mundell wrote: “A vote to leave would trade in our power and influence as the EU’s second largest economy for the weakness and irrelevance of observer status”. Why does he now support “the weakness and irrelevance of observer status” that will come with Brexit?

25. Before the EU referendum David Mundell wrote: “Others say that losing our free and unrestricted access to a single market of 500 million people…will leave us no worse off. That sounds to me like it’s too good to be true.” How “true” is it now?

Economic impact

26. What work has the UK Government done on the overall impact of Brexit of employment levels in the UK?

27. Does the UK Government still stand by the pre-referendum economic projection papers published by HM Treasury?

28. Along with Nissan, how many firms have indicated that they are pausing or reviewing investment decisions since the Brexit vote?

29. How will multi-national companies with bases and operations here and elsewhere in EU be supported to maintain those bases and profitability without incurring additional costs?

30. How many inward investment proposals is the UK Government aware of that have not gone ahead since the EU referendum?

31. What is the likely impact of Brexit on exports of Scottish food and drink, such as seafood, meat and whisky to the EU and through EU Free Trade Agreements?

32. Has the UK Government conducted any formal or informal negotiations about EFTA membership?

33. What will the future of passporting for financial services be?

34. On 28 June 2016 Ruth Davidson said: “I am absolutely sure that my role is to … help [get], particularly in my patch of the world, passporting for financial services”. Does she still support getting passporting for financial services and will she support free movement to retain it?

35. What substance is there to suggestions that the UK Government is prepared to agree a continued single market for bankers and the financial services sector alone?

36. On 6 June 2016 the then Prime Minister David Cameron said a ‘Leave’ vote would “put a bomb under the economy…[and]…we’d have lit the fuse ourselves”. How will the Conservative party defuse this metaphoric bomb under our economy?

37. What impact will leaving the EU have on tax revenues?

38. What impact will leaving the EU have on UK GDP?

39. What impact will leaving the EU have on UK productivity?

40. What impact will leaving the EU have on Scottish exports?

41. Has the UK government carried out any assessment of investor confidence in the UK energy market among energy firms?

42. Will the UK Government remove current EU regulations on food and plant safety?

Impact on business

43. Will the UK implement the EU Digital Single Market Strategy and participate in the Digital Single Market?

44. Will Scottish businesses and individuals lose out on the changes to mobile roaming charges coming into effect next year?

45. Will the UK still be a member of the Single Aviation Market?

46. Will the UK continue to adhere to the common rules and procedures of EU consumer protection legislation?

47. Will Scottish businesses and families lose out on the EU pledge to introduce free wifi by 2020 into major EU cities and capitals?

48. Will Scottish businesses and families lose out on the EU pledge to roll out 5G by 2025?

49. Will foods that currently have protected geographical indication under EU law still be protected in this way?

50. What impact will Brexit have on skills in the construction sector?

51. Will the UK Government introduce tariffs on the import of raw construction materials and what impact would this have on public infrastructure projects, including housing?

52. How will the UK Government ensure that Brexit does not make it more difficult for the construction industry to secure loans for building new homes?

53. Will the UK Government guarantee that the operating and administrative costs incurred by LEADER local action groups throughout the lifetime of funded projects will be met?

Workplace rights

54. Will provisions in employment law pertaining to annual leave, which is underpinned by EU law, be maintained after Brexit?

55. Will the rights of agency workers, part-time workers or fixed term workers, all of which are underpinned by EU law, be maintained post-Brexit?

56. Will the health and safety obligations of UK workplaces be maintained after the UK leaves the EU?

57. Will state-guaranteed payments for employees whose employers face insolvency, which are guaranteed by the EU, be maintained after Brexit?

58. Will EU-guaranteed redundancy rights for employees be maintained after the UK leaves the EU?

59. Will the current level of paternity, maternity and parental leave, which is underpinned by EU law, be maintained after Brexit?

60. Will the current anti-discrimination legislation, underpinned by EU law, be maintained after Brexit?

61. Will the working time directive still apply to workers in the UK?

Free movement

62. Will EU citizens living in the UK now be allowed to remain, to work and to retain all their current rights?

63. Will UK citizens have to apply for visas to travel to Europe?

64. Will EU-wide health entitlement cards still be valid for UK citizens?

65. Will UK citizens living in the EU be given the right to remain and retain their rights to access services there?

66. What will happen to the 8 per cent of EU nationals currently employed in our fishing fleet?

67. What will happen to the estimated 30,000 EU nationals working in our food and drink sector?

Personal finances

68. Before the 23rd June vote David Mundell wrote: “All the economic experts predict that the potential damage a Brexit would do to jobs, mortgages and the economy as a whole across Scotland is just too severe.” How “severe” will Brexit be for jobs, mortgages and the economy in Scotland if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

69. In his article of 23rd June 2016 David Mundell wrote: “…when Remainers ask…how a collapse in the stock market will impact upon people’s pension pots…we deserve to have answers from the Vote Leave campaign.” In light of reports that Brexit has caused greater deficits in pension funds, with gilt yields at historic lows, can Mr Mundell tell those pensioners how Scotland being pulled out of the EU will be good for their pensions?

70. On 11 June 2016, Ruth Davidson said: “It’s clear that following the fantasy economics of the Leave campaign would put this universal dream [of buying a first home] at risk. Families…can’t afford a vote to leave.” How will she protect this “universal dream” and how could families in Scotland afford a home if Scotland were to be pulled out of the EU?

EU funding streams

71. What guarantees can the UK Government give on replacing EU structural funding which will be lost as a result of Brexit?

72. What guarantees can the UK Government give on support for farming beyond 2020?

73. Will the UK Government guarantee the £360 million funding Scotland is entitled to receive for fishing, farming and food that is unlikely to be secured by the date of the Autumn Statement?

74. Will the UK Government guarantee the £20 million of ERDF funding allocated for digital connectivity in the Highlands and Islands if contracts cannot be secured by the date of the autumn statement?

75. What will the future arrangements be for managing our fishing resources?

76. Will funding for the fishing sector, through the European and Maritime Fisheries Fund, be maintained?

77. On 15 June 2016 David Mundell said “fishermen are wrong in the sense there is no way we would just go back to Scotland or Britain controlling British waters”. Does the Secretary of State still think they are “wrong”?

78. Will the UK Government meet any financial penalties imposed by the EU for not spending Scottish Rural Development Programme funds?

Health and Social Security

79. Will UK workers living in other member states still be entitled to social security benefits?

80. What will the impact of changes to freedom of movement be on NHS staff recruitment and retention?

81. Will the UK continue to participate on EU-wide public health initiatives?

82. Will mutual recognition of medical qualifications across the EU continue?

83. Will the UK continue to adhere to EU-wide medicines regulation?

84. What impact would leaving the EU have on professional sport, including football?

Education

85. Will Scottish students still be able to participate in the Erasmus scheme?

86. How will academics living and working in Scotland, or elsewhere in the UK, be supported to travel to EU countries and Higher Education institutions to participate in learning and research opportunities?

87. Will UK universities and research institutions still be able to access EU funding?

88. Will academics living and working in EU countries be able to travel to Scotland, and elsewhere in the UK, to collaborate on learning and research without a visa?

Justice and Security

89. If the UK Government opts out of a new European policing co-operation framework, how will Police Scotland continue to have access to key data, co-operation and other resources held by the EU crime-fighting agency Europol?

90. Will police in the UK continue to have use of the European Arrest Warrant?

91. On 21 June 2016, Ruth Davidson referenced a number of policing, security organisation and states saying “we’re safer in the EU” and that if it came to choice between them and the ‘Leave’ campaign about “who keeps my family safe I’m going to vote for them every single day of the week and twice on Sunday.” Now that she appears to support Brexit how will people’s families be safer if we leave the EU?

92. Will the UK have any role in influencing or shaping the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy?

Brexit process

93. If the Courts say that Parliamentary approval is needed by the House of Commons and the House of Lords in order for the UK to exit the European Union, will the UK Government seek that approva

94. Will the UK Government seek approval of the Scottish Parliament before triggering article 50?

95. Will the UK Government ensure that its negotiating position is agreed by all devolved nations prior to article 50 being triggered?

96. When will article 50 be triggered?

97. Will devolved nations be invited to participate in any Brexit negotiations?

98. How many meetings has the Prime Minister had with the Brexit ministers?

Pre-independence referendum promises

99. In the independence referendum the Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson promised that voting “No means we stay in” the EU. How do the Tories plan to keep that promise to those that voted No in 2014?

100. In a joint statement of 5 August 2014 David Cameron and the Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson – along with Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg then Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont, the LibDems’ Willie Rennie, signed a pledge saying: “Power lies with the Scottish people and we believe it is for the Scottish people to decide how Scotland is governed.” How will the Conservatives keep this pledge on which they won a No vote if Scotland is pulled out of the EU against its will?

ARTICLE SOURCE: http://www.snp.org/100_unanswered_questions_100_days_from_the_brexit_result